Meaning Recognition Terms in Arabic Semantic Studies
Downloads
Background. This research is motivated by the complexity of understanding meaning in linguistic contexts, especially in Arabic, which involves various semantic theories.
Purpose. The purpose of the study is to examine theories of understanding meaning in Arabic semantics to provide a foundation for the effective and efficient use of language.
Method. The method used is a literature study with data sources from scientific books and articles accessed online.
Results. The results show that there are five main theories in understanding meaning in Arabic semantics: referential theory (al-nazhariyah al-isyariyah) which identifies meaning based on its references, ideological theory (al-nazhariyah al-thashawuriyah) which views language as a means of conveying ideas, behaviorist theory (al-nazhariyah al-sulukiyah) which studies meaning through the behavior of language users, contextual theory (al-nazhariyah al-siyaqiyah) which emphasizes the importance of context in expressing meaning, and the theory of the field of meaning (nazhariyah al-huqul al-dalaaliyah) which views vocabulary as part of an interconnected area or field.
Conclusion. In conclusion, an understanding of these theories is important for exploring the complexity of meaning in the linguistic context of the Arabic language, so that it can support better use of the language.
Al-Khuli, M. A. (2001). Ilm Al-Dilalah (Vol. 1). Daar Al Falah.
Azhar, M., & Abbas, A. (2022). Pengantar Linguistik Modern. OSF Preprints, https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/vxp96, I(2), 1–11.
Bernice, A. (2021). Language and the Brain: A Twofold Study of Language Production and Language Comprehension as a Separate or Integrated Set of Processes. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(5), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.5.9
Cariaga, R. F. (2023). The Basic Concepts of Philosophy. Researchh Gate, December, 33–55. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400643439.ch-003
Delfia, E. (2022). JURNAL SCIENTIA INDONESIA Landasan Filosofis Paradigma Linguistik Chomsky. JURNAL SCIENTIA INDOENSIA, 2(1), 9–17.
Feist, J. (2022). Significance in Language: A Theory of Semantics. Dalam Significance in Language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003259381
Ginting, H., & Ginting, A. (2019). Beberapa Teori Dan Pendekatan Semantik. Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia dan Sastra (Pendistra), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.54367/pendistra.v2i2.594
Ginting, S. P. A., Rangkuti, R., & Yusuf, M. (2020). Function of The Language Style Used in Women Commercial Product Advertisements: A Stylistic Analysis of Language. Rainbow: Journal of Literature, Linguistics and Cultural Studies, 9(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.15294/rainbow.v9i2.39987
Hameed, J. Q. (2013). Evaluation of the Semantic Field Theory and Componential Analysis as Theoretical Approaches of Potential Value to Vocabulary Acquisition: With Special Reference to the Learner ’ s Collocational Competence. Journal of the College of Arts University of Basra, 64, 1–27.
Hotnida Novita Sary. (2015). ANALISIS KOMPONEN MEDAN MAKNA RUMAH(KAJIAN SEMANTIK) Meaning. Sirok Bastra Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan, 3(3), 1–8.
Huda, M. (2021). Konsep Teori Behavioral (Al-Nazariyah Al-Sulukiyah): Teori, Konsep dan praktek Pemerolehan Bahasa). Journal El Wahdah, 2(2), 93–111.
Khuya, I. Bin. (2016). Ilmu Semantik (Ilm Al-Dilalah). Dalam ???? ?????? (hlm. 183). Moderm Book’s World.
Kurniawan, A., & Dkk. (2023). Semantik. Dalam A. Yanto (Ed.), Revista Mexicana de Sociología (Vol. 37, Nomor 4). PT Global Eksekutif Teknologi. https://doi.org/10.2307/3539870
Mailani, O., Nuraeni, I., Syakila, S. A., & Lazuardi, J. (2022). Bahasa Sebagai Alat Komunikasi Dalam Kehidupan Manusia. Kampret Journal, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35335/kampret.v1i1.8
Mastur. (2020). Ilmu Dilalah. Iain Jember, 1–78.
Nafinuddin, S. (2020). Pengantar Semantik (Pengertian, Hakikat, Jenis). Pengantar Sematik, 1–21.
Nur Zakiyah, S. (2021). Ungkapan Metaforis Teks Terjemahan Al-Qur’an Bahasa Sunda Surat Al-Baqarah: Analisis Semantik Kognitif. LITERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah, 11(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.23969/literasi.v11i1.3512
Plebe, A., & De La Cruz, V. M. (2017). Semantic Theories. Studies in Brain and Mind, 10, 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28552-8_5
Raudatussolihah, B., & Ritazhuhriah. (2021). Analisis Linguistik dalam Al-Qur’an (Studi Semantik terhadap QS. Al-’Alaq). Al Waraqah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 1(1), 41–56.
Sarifuddin, M. (2021). Konsep Dasar Makna Dalam Ranah Semantik. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v5i2.2024
Senis, A. (2023). Anthropology and Linguistics in Great Britain Bronislaw Malinowski and John Rupert Firth. Histoire Epistemologie Langage, 44(2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.4000/hel.3087
Umar, A. M. (1998). Ilmu Dilalah. Maktabah Dar Al-Arubah.
Uzun, G. O. (2020). A review of communication, body language and communication conflict. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(9), 2833–2844.
Wulandari, P. A., & Fadilla, A. R. (2023). Literature Review of Types and Relations of Word Meanings At the Linguistic Level of Indonesian. Journal of Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(2), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.35529/jllte.v5i2.9-26
Yunus, S. Bin. (2020). Muhadharaat fii Ilm Al-Dalalah. Dalam Ilm AL-Dalalah.
Yusuf, A.-S. A.-A. (2020). Al-Dalalah Wa Ilm Al-Dalalah. www.alukah.net, 13.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aathifah Al Farros, Ida Wijayanti, Agustiar Agustiar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
