Implementation of the MBKM Curriculum (Independent Learning Independent Campus) Towards the Islamic Religious Education Study Program at Higher College Level
Abstract
Background. Universities have so far implemented a credit learning system which is almost entirely dependent on classroom learning. This shows the low level of learning independence for students. Therefore, the idea of “Independent Learning Independent Campus” emerged, or "MBKM", and is currently a program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia.
Purpose. This research aims to describe the implementation of the MBKM curriculum in Islamic religious education study programs in higher education. Based on data obtained from the official Ministry of Education and Culture website, it shows the rapid growth of universities implementing the MBKM program, from 576 universities in 2022 to 921 universities in 2023, or an increase of 60% per year.
Method. This type of research is library research. This research uses a content analysis method, namely a technique that identifies every word, sentence in a text or series of texts, concepts or themes. Meanwhile, the data sources used by researchers are books and research journals related to problem formulation.
Results. The research results show that the MBKM curriculum (Independent Learning Independent Campus) is a new curriculum that is still hotly discussed in higher education circles. With the inauguration of MBKM, every university must prepare everything to support the success of the program. Several universities still face several obstacles in their implementation, as seen at UIN Walisongo and Unida Gontor.
Conclusion. Thus, it is natural that every tertiary institution faces various difficulties in implementing MBKM. Therefore, universities must prepare well and hold outreach so that information can be widely accepted and understood by all parties, both lecturers and students.
Full text article
References
Acikkar, M., & Akay, M. F. (2009). Support vector machines for predicting the admission decision of a candidate to the School of Physical Education and Sports at Cukurova University. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7228–7233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.007
Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2014). Towards an Agile Approach to Adapting Dynamic Collaboration Support to Student Needs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 92–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0012-6
Agaoglu, M. (2016). Predicting Instructor Performance Using Data Mining Techniques in Higher Education. IEEE Access, 4, 2379–2387. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2568756
Ahmad, S. F., Alam, M. M., Rahmat, Mohd. K., Mubarik, M. S., & Hyder, S. I. (2022). Academic and Administrative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Sustainability, 14(3), 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031101
Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
Alicia, V., & Rani, I. H. (2022). KONTRIBUSI APLIKASI SISTEM MANAJEMEN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS SIBER TERHADAP KOMPLEKSITAS MANAJEMEN TINDAKAN KELAS. Jurnal Pendidikan, 23(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.33830/jp.v23i1.2611.2022
Antonopoulos, I., Robu, V., Couraud, B., Kirli, D., Norbu, S., Kiprakis, A., Flynn, D., Elizondo-Gonzalez, S., & Wattam, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to energy demand-side response: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 130, 109899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109899
Aparicio, F., Morales-Botello, M. L., Rubio, M., Hernando, A., Muñoz, R., López-Fernández, H., Glez-Peña, D., Fdez-Riverola, F., De La Villa, M., Maña, M., Gachet, D., & Buenaga, M. D. (2018). Perceptions of the use of intelligent information access systems in university level active learning activities among teachers of biomedical subjects. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 112, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.016
Aspegren, K. (1999). BEME Guide No. 2: Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine-a review with quality grading of articles. Medical Teacher, 21(6), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599978979
Baker, R. S. (2016). Stupid Tutoring Systems, Intelligent Humans. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0105-0
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
Ding, Y. (2021). Performance analysis of public management teaching practice training based on artificial intelligence technology. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 40(2), 3787–3800. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-189412
Dosilovic, F. K., Brcic, M., & Hlupic, N. (2018). Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey. 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 0210–0215. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400040
Ertefaie, A., Small, D. S., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (2018). Quantitative Evaluation of the Trade-Off of Strengthened Instruments and Sample Size in Observational Studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(523), 1122–1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1305275
Faculty of Education, University of Osijek, Cara Hadrijana 10, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia, & ?ur?evi? Babi?, I. (2017). Machine learning methods in predicting the student academic motivation. Croatian Operational Research Review, 8(2), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.17535/crorr.2017.0028
George, B., & Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the Strategic Transformation of Higher Education through Artificial Intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090196
Guerin, S. H. (2009). Internationalizing the Curriculum: Improving Learning Through International Education: Preparing Students for Success in a Global Society. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33(8), 611–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920902928945
Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for Assessment and Feedback to Enhance Student Success in Higher Education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722
Lau, C. L., & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2002). Knowledge Management Education and Curriculum Development. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 01(02), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021964920200042X
Li, L., Qin, L., Xu, Z., Yin, Y., Wang, X., Kong, B., Bai, J., Lu, Y., Fang, Z., Song, Q., Cao, K., Liu, D., Wang, G., Xu, Q., Fang, X., Zhang, S., Xia, J., & Xia, J. (2020). Using Artificial Intelligence to Detect COVID-19 and Community-acquired Pneumonia Based on Pulmonary CT: Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy. Radiology, 296(2), E65–E71. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200905
Lukita, C., Suwandi, S., Harahap, E. P., Rahardja, U., & Nas, C. (2020). Curriculum 4.0: Adoption of Industry Era 4.0 as Assessment of Higher Education Quality. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 14(3), 297. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.57321
Maesaroh, S., Lubis, R. R., Husna, L. N., Widyaningsih, R., & Susilawati, R. (2022). Efektivitas Implementasi Manajemen Business Intelligence pada Industri 4.0. ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, 3(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.34306/abdi.v3i2.764
Mohamed, S. (2023). The development of an Arabic curriculum framework based on a compilation of salient features from CEFR level descriptors. The Language Learning Journal, 51(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2021.1923781
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J., Carvalhais, N., & Prabhat. (2019). Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature, 566(7743), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1
Rofiah, C., & Bungin, B. (2021). QUALITATIVE METHODS: SIMPLE RESEARCH WITH TRIANGULATION THEORY DESIGN. Develop, 5(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.25139/dev.v5i1.3690
Somasundaram, M., Junaid, K. A. M., & Mangadu, S. (2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Enabled Intelligent Quality Management System (IQMS) For Personalized Learning Path. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 438–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.096
Yin, H., Lee, J. C.-K., & Wang, W. (2014). Dilemmas of leading national curriculum reform in a global era: A Chinese perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(2), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499261
Yustiasari Liriwati, F. (2023). Transformasi Kurikulum; Kecerdasan Buatan untuk Membangun Pendidikan yang Relevan di Masa Depan. Jurnal IHSAN?: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.61
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zinser, R. (2012). A curriculum model of a foundation for educating the global citizens of the future. On the Horizon, 20(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121211202080
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Khairatunni'mah. SM

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.