The Contribution of Kalam in Resolving Contemporary Theological Controversies: A Study of Rational Debates
Article Sidebar
-
Islamic Theology, Rational Debates, Theological Controversies
Abstract
The discipline of Kal?m (Islamic theology) has historically served as a framework for addressing theological controversies, utilizing rational discourse to harmonize scriptural interpretation with intellectual inquiry. In the modern era, theological debates concerning issues such as faith, ethics, and the reconciliation of science and religion have intensified, necessitating renewed exploration of Kal?m as a method for resolving these challenges. This study examines the contribution of Kal?m in addressing contemporary theological controversies through rational debates and intellectual engagement. A qualitative approach was employed, combining historical analysis and textual study of classical Kal?m works with case studies of modern applications in theological discourse. Data were collected through critical analysis of primary texts and interviews with contemporary theologians and scholars actively engaging in rational debates on theological issues. The findings demonstrate that Kal?m provides a robust intellectual foundation for navigating contemporary theological controversies. Its emphasis on rational argumentation fosters constructive dialogue between traditional Islamic perspectives and modern intellectual paradigms. The study concludes that Kal?m remains a vital tool for resolving contemporary theological controversies, bridging the gap between tradition and modernity.
Full text article
References
Abdelnour, M. G. (2022). The higher objectives of Islamic theology: Toward a theory of Maqasid al-Aqida. In The Higher Objectives of Islamic Theology: Toward a Theory of Maqasid al-Aqida (p. 164). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197648636.001.0001
Abdelnour, M. G. (2023). The Qur??n and the Future of Islamic Analytic Theology. Religions, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040556
Ali, I. (2023). Philosophy versus theology in medieval Islamic thought. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(5). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i5.9305
Antipina, Y. (2023). MOLECULARITY and ‘SOBORNOST’ on the WAY to CHURCH UNITY: ARCHPRIEST SERGEY BULGAKOV’S THEOLOGICAL CONTROVERSY on the QUESTION of EUCHARISTIC COMMUNION with the NON-ORTHODOX. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo Gumanitarnogo Universiteta, Seria I. Bogoslovie, Filosofia, Religiovedenie, 106(Query date: 2025-01-09 00:47:19), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.15382/sturI2023106.44-65
Baig, N. (2022). The islamic theology behind spiritual care and hospital chaplaincy. Complexities of Spiritual Care in Plural Societies: Education, Praxis and Concepts, Query date: 2025-01-09 00:45:33, 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110717365-005
Bar-Zeev, Y. (2024). Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco—Europe Debate: Nicotine Use is Hardly Rational. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 26(7), 954–956. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae028
Bauer, G. R. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM - Population Health, 14(Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798
Camaj, L. (2021). Real time political deliberation on social media: Can televised debates lead to rational and civil discussions on broadcasters’ Facebook pages? Information Communication and Society, 24(13), 1907–1924. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1749695
Cox, S. (2024). SRNT Europe Debate: Is Nicotine Use Rational? Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 26(7), 795–795. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae059
Dag, E. A. (2022). Problematising the Islamic Theology of Religions: Debates on Muslims’ Views of Others. Religions, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030223
Darmalaksana, W. (2022). The need for social theology to strengthen the social functions of Islamic banking in Indonesia. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7342
Dawkins, L. (2024). Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco Europe Debate: The Use of Nicotine Oral Products in Adults May be a Rational Behavior. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 26(7), 957–958. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae029
Farid, A. S. (2024). Theology and Ethics in Values-Based Journalism Communicating Islamic Perspectives. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.226
García-Alonso, M. (2022). Pierre Bayle and the impossibility of a rational debate on evil. Daimon, 86, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.425171
Iqbal, B. K. (2022). Reprising Islamic Political Theology: Genre and the Time of Tribulation. Political Theology, 23(6), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2022.2092680
Ji, H. (2021). Qualitative and quantitative recognition method of drug-producing chemicals based on SnO2 gas sensor with dynamic measurement and PCA weak separation. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 348(Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130698
Kalimi, I. (2021). Early Jewish Exegesis and Theological Controversy: Studies in Scriptures in the Shadow of Internal and External Controversies. In Early Jewish Exegesis and Theological Controversy: Studies in Scriptures in the Shadow of Internal and External Controversies (p. 209). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004493605
Karman. (2023). THE QUR’ANIC LEARNING BASED ON ISLAMIC ECO-THEOLOGY AT PESANTREN. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v9i2.24933
Li, D. (2020). Nanosol SERS quantitative analytical method: A review. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 127(Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.115885
McFadden, D. (2021). Quantitative methods for analysing travel behaviour ofindividuals: Some recent developments. Behavioural Travel Modelling, Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11, 279–318.
McLaughlin, S. (2023). Rhetorical (ir)responsibility in the Australian Parliament: Resurrecting Aristotle’s deliberative rhetoric as means to ethical, rational, and constructive climate change debate. Journal of Language and Politics, 22(5), 622–639. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22127.mcl
Mueller, A. V. (2020). Quantitative Method for Comparative Assessment of Particle Removal Efficiency of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks for PPE. Matter, 3(3), 950–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.07.006
Muhtifah, L. (2021). The theology of islamic moderation education in Singkawang, Indonesia: The city of tolerance. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V77I4.6552
Mustafa, A. R. (2021). Supernatural, Unnatural, Queer: Gratitude and Nature in Islamic Political Theology. Political Theology, 22(8), 699–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1920219
Öncel, S. (2022). Rational Defensive Medicine: Putting an End to the Nationwide Favipiravir Debate. Turkish Archives of Pediatrics, 57(3), 372–373. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2022.22014
Playford, R. (2024). The alien in the lamp? The jinn and alien life in Islamic theology. Islamic Theology and Extraterrestrial Life: New Frontiers in Science and Religion, Query date: 2025-01-09 00:45:33, 159–173. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755650910.0012
Poljarevic, E. (2021). Theology of Violence-oriented Takfirism as a Political Theory: The Case of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion, 21(Query date: 2025-01-09 00:45:33), 485–512. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435544_026
Qomaruzzaman, B. (2021). The theology of non-violenct islamic education based on al-sira al-nabawiyya. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6268
Qu, T. X. (2023). The theological controversy between Paul Tillich and Karl Barth in 1923: A historical and interpretative reconstruction. Paul Tillich and Sino-Christian Theology, Query date: 2025-01-09 00:47:19, 152–174. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003405610-8
Rahemtulla, S. (2023). The Future of Islamic Liberation Theology. Religions, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091079
Saffari, S. (2024). Political Islam and emancipatory politics: Snapshots of Islamic liberation theology. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 25(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2024.2310280
Schvarcz, B. (2022). The Froman Peace Campaign: Pluralism in Judeo-Islamic Theology and Politics. Politics and Religion, 15(3), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048321000365
Sejdini, Z. (2022). Rethinking Islam in Europe: Contemporary approaches in Islamic religious education and theology. In Rethinking Islam in Europe: Contemporary Approaches in Islamic Religious Education and Theology (p. 187). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110752410
Serapion, M. (2023). St Cyril of Alexandria and the Council of Nicaea: The Framing of a Theological Controversy. Ecumenical Review, 75(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/erev.12786
Sheldrick, R. C. (2021). The debate over rational decision making in evidence-based medicine: Implications for evidence-informed policy. Evidence and Policy, 17(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426419X15677739896923
Smith, D. A. (2022). LORD OF THE SABBATH CONTROVERSIES: LUKE’S DEVELOPMENT OF A THEOLOGICAL VISION. Revue Biblique, 129(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.2143/RBI.129.1.3290180
Sobirin, M. (2023). The pesantren scholars’ Fatwa on global warming and climate change: An integrative analysis of Islamic law, theology, and environmental sciences on the practice of multidisciplinary Ijtihad. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2193023
Tomaszewska, A. (2022). Kant’s rational religion and the radical enlightenment: From Spinoza to contemporary debates. In Kant’s Rational Religion and the Radical Enlightenment: From Spinoza to Contemporary Debates (p. 226). https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85146175200
Weber, I. M. (2022). Neoliberal Economic Thinking and the Quest for Rational Socialism in China: Ludwig von Mises and the Market Reform Debate. Journal of the History of Ideas, 83(2), 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2022.0016
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Mufron, Sofia Lim, Rachel Chan, Jasafat Jasafat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
