Analysis of factors that influence student creativity in solving mathematical problems
Article Sidebar
-
Cognitive Factors, Mathematical Creativity, Problem-Solving
Abstract
Creativity in solving mathematical problems is a critical skill for students, enabling them to think innovatively and apply knowledge in diverse contexts. However, the development of mathematical creativity is influenced by various factors, including cognitive, environmental, and instructional aspects. Understanding these factors is essential to designing effective strategies to foster creativity in mathematics education. Despite its importance, there is limited research exploring the interplay of these factors in influencing student creativity. This study aims to analyze the factors that influence student creativity in solving mathematical problems and determine which factors have the most significant impact. A mixed-method approach was employed, involving 150 high school students from three schools. Data were collected using a creativity assessment test, a questionnaire on cognitive and environmental factors, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using regression analysis, while qualitative data were subjected to thematic analysis. The findings revealed that cognitive factors, such as critical thinking and prior knowledge, were the strongest predictors of mathematical creativity. Environmental factors, including classroom climate and teacher support, also played a significant role. Instructional methods, particularly problem-based learning, were found to enhance creativity by encouraging exploration and independent thinking. The study highlights the multifaceted nature of mathematical creativity and the need for comprehensive strategies that address cognitive, environmental, and instructional factors to foster creativity in mathematics education.
Full text article
References
Andrews-Todd, J., & Forsyth, C. M. (2020). Exploring social and cognitive dimensions of collaborative problem solving in an open online simulation-based task. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 105759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.025
Araiza-Alba, P., Keane, T., Chen, W. S., & Kaufman, J. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a tool to learn problem-solving skills. Computers & Education, 164, 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104121
Aslan, A. (2021). Problem- based learning in live online classes: Learning achievement, problem-solving skill, communication skill, and interaction. Computers & Education, 171, 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104237
Banaie-Dezfouli, M., Nadimi-Shahraki, M. H., & Beheshti, Z. (2021). R-GWO: Representative-based grey wolf optimizer for solving engineering problems. Applied Soft Computing, 106, 107328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107328
Bangyal, W. H., Nisar, K., Ag. Ibrahim, Ag. A. B., Haque, M. R., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Rawat, D. B. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Low Discrepancy Sequence-Based Initialization Approaches Using Population-Based Algorithms for Solving the Global Optimization Problems. Applied Sciences, 11(16), 7591. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167591
Blagoeva, R. R., Mom, T. J. M., Jansen, J. J. P., & George, G. (2020). Problem-Solving or Self-Enhancement? A Power Perspective on How CEOs Affect R&D Search in the Face of Inconsistent Feedback. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 332–355. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0999
Bogar, E., & Beyhan, S. (2020). Adolescent Identity Search Algorithm (AISA): A novel metaheuristic approach for solving optimization problems. Applied Soft Computing, 95, 106503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106503
Brennecke, J. (2020). Dissonant Ties in Intraorganizational Networks: Why Individuals Seek Problem-Solving Assistance from Difficult Colleagues. Academy of Management Journal, 63(3), 743–778. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0399
Chou, J.-S., & Truong, D.-N. (2020). Multiobjective optimization inspired by behavior of jellyfish for solving structural design problems. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 135, 109738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109738
Di Caprio, D., Ebrahimnejad, A., Alrezaamiri, H., & Santos-Arteaga, F. J. (2022). A novel ant colony algorithm for solving shortest path problems with fuzzy arc weights. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(5), 3403–3415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.058
Elshaer, R., & Awad, H. (2020). A taxonomic review of metaheuristic algorithms for solving the vehicle routing problem and its variants. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 140, 106242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106242
Gao, H., Zahr, M. J., & Wang, J.-X. (2022). Physics-informed graph neural Galerkin networks: A unified framework for solving PDE-governed forward and inverse problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 390, 114502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.114502
Islam, Md. A., Gajpal, Y., & ElMekkawy, T. Y. (2021). Hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving the clustered vehicle routing problem. Applied Soft Computing, 110, 107655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107655
Karami, H., Anaraki, M. V., Farzin, S., & Mirjalili, S. (2021). Flow Direction Algorithm (FDA): A Novel Optimization Approach for Solving Optimization Problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 156, 107224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107224
Koch, T., Gläser, D., Weishaupt, K., Ackermann, S., Beck, M., Becker, B., Burbulla, S., Class, H., Coltman, E., Emmert, S., Fetzer, T., Grüninger, C., Heck, K., Hommel, J., Kurz, T., Lipp, M., Mohammadi, F., Scherrer, S., Schneider, M., … Flemisch, B. (2021). DuMux 3 – an open-source simulator for solving flow and transport problems in porous media with a focus on model coupling. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 81, 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.012
Kou, G., Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2022). Inventive problem-solving map of innovative carbon emission strategies for solar energy-based transportation investment projects. Applied Energy, 311, 118680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118680
Li, L.-L., Liu, Z.-F., Tseng, M.-L., Zheng, S.-J., & Lim, M. K. (2021). Improved tunicate swarm algorithm: Solving the dynamic economic emission dispatch problems. Applied Soft Computing, 108, 107504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107504
Li, Y., Huang, W., Wu, R., & Guo, K. (2020). An improved artificial bee colony algorithm for solving multi-objective low-carbon flexible job shop scheduling problem. Applied Soft Computing, 95, 106544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106544
Ong, K. M., Ong, P., & Sia, C. K. (2021). A carnivorous plant algorithm for solving global optimization problems. Applied Soft Computing, 98, 106833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106833
Rahman, H. F., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Ryan, M. J. (2020). Memetic algorithm for solving resource constrained project scheduling problems. Automation in Construction, 111, 103052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103052
Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., Farrell, C., & Shaffer, D. W. (2020). Assessing individual contributions to Collaborative Problem Solving: A network analysis approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 105876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.009
Xu, Y., Shieh, C.-H., Van Esch, P., & Ling, I.-L. (2020). AI Customer Service: Task Complexity, Problem-Solving Ability, and Usage Intention. Australasian Marketing Journal, 28(4), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.03.005
You, X., Li, W., & Chai, Y. (2020). A truly meshfree method for solving acoustic problems using local weak form and radial basis functions. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 365, 124694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124694
Younes, Z., Alhamrouni, I., Mekhilef, S., & Reyasudin, M. (2021). A memory-based gravitational search algorithm for solving economic dispatch problem in micro-grid. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(2), 1985–1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.10.021
Zhao, W., Zhang, Z., Mirjalili, S., Wang, L., Khodadadi, N., & Mirjalili, S. M. (2022). An effective multi-objective artificial hummingbird algorithm with dynamic elimination-based crowding distance for solving engineering design problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 398, 115223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.115223
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Vicheka Rith, Vann Sok, Ravi Dara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
