Analysis of factors that influence student preferences for online learning
Article Sidebar
-
Analysis, Online, Preferences
Abstract
Background. Online learning is a learning system that is not conducted face-to-face between teachers and students. Preference is a tendency made for one thing compared to another. Therefore, one's view on online learning will also vary. The quality and quantity of learning materials that are in accordance with the curriculum, standards, competencies, and student needs will differentiate students' preferences for online learning.
Purpose This research aims to find out the reasons why students prefer online learning or not, and also to find out the factors that significantly influence the effectiveness of online learning. On the other hand, to analyse the appropriate strategy used in the use of media so that it is suitable for learning and can also be accessed by all individuals.
Method. The method used in this research is quantitative. A method in which data is collected in the form of testable numbers. The data obtained is the number of responses. The data is obtained from the distribution of questionnaires containing questions regarding the analysis of factors affecting students' preferences for online learning. The statement presented in the questionnaire is a form of google form. The data will be processed through the oneway anova test on the SPSS application which was previously imported into excel.
Results. The result of this study states that online learning can be done in schools. Online learning is also a way of learning without face-to-face in sharing information or communicating. Online learning has advantages and disadvantages depending on various factors that influence students' preferences for online learning. In addition, it also provides a strategic overview for teachers and students of the situation and what things will be prepared later.
Conclusion This research can be concluded that the preference or choice of each student is different depending on how he/she views the subject. Online learning can be run effectively with good cooperation. Online learning will be implemented if there is support from all parties, be it students, teachers, parents, and even schools. Adjustment in learning is also easier for female students than male students.
Full text article
References
Abuhassna, H. (2022). From Student’s Experience: Does E-learning Course Structure Influenced by learner’s Prior Experience, Background Knowledge, Autonomy, and Dialogue. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/11386
Al-Azzam, N. (2020). A cross-sectional study to determine factors affecting dental and medical students’ preference for virtual learning during the COVID-19 outbreak. Heliyon, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05704
Al-Mawee, W. (2021). Student’s perspective on distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of Western Michigan University, United States. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2(Query date: 2024-02-26 16:25:49). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100080
Almendingen, K. (2021). Student’s experiences with online teaching following COVID-19 lockdown: A mixed methods explorative study. PLoS ONE, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250378
Alonso-García, M. (2021). Impact of covid-19 on educational sustainability. Initial perceptions of the university community of the university of cádiz. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115938
Ariffin, K. (2021). Discovering Students’ Strategies in Learning English Online. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.12695
Ashraf, S. (2020). Quantitative Particle Uptake by Cells as Analyzed by Different Methods. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 59(14), 5438–5453. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201906303
Banks, D. P. (2022). Online and In-Person Learning Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic among Students Attending the City University of New York. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00012-22
Bhagat, K. K. (2019). The impact of personality on students’ perceptions towards online learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4162
Bhaskaran, S. (2023). Enhanced personalized recommendation system for machine learning public datasets: Generalized modeling, simulation, significant results and analysis. International Journal of Information Technology (Singapore), 15(3), 1583–1595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-023-01165-2
Bontchev, B. P. (2020). Personalization of serious games for learning. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2020-0069
Bouilheres, F. (2020). Defining student learning experience through blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3049–3069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10100-y
Bramer, C. (2020). Preregistration adult nursing students’ experiences of online learning: A qualitative study. British Journal of Nursing, 29(12), 677–683. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2020.29.12.677
Bumblauskas, D. (2021). The convergence of online teaching and problem based learning modules amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 19(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.19.3.2295
Campa, F. (2021). Assessment of body composition in athletes: A narrative review of available methods with special reference to quantitative and qualitative bioimpedance analysis. Nutrients, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051620
Cheng, D. (2020). Screencast Video Feedback in Online TESOL Classes. Computers and Composition, 58(Query date: 2024-02-26 16:25:49). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102612
Conde, M. (2020). A Learning Analytics tool for the analysis of students’ Telegram messages in the context of teamwork virtual activities. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Query date: 2024-02-26 16:25:49, 719–724. https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436601
Gherhe?, V. (2021). E-learning vs. Face-to-face learning: Analyzing students’ preferences and behaviors. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381
Limbers, C. A. (2021). Factors Associated with Caregiver Preferences for Children’s Return to School during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of School Health, 91(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12971
McWatt, S. C. (2021). Responding to Covid-19: A thematic analysis of students’ perspectives on modified learning activities during an emergency transition to remote human anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 14(6), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2136
Robles, H. (2019). Online teacher-students interactions using Whatsapp in a law course. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18(Query date: 2024-02-26 16:25:49), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.28945/4321
Sena, D. P. D. (2019). Comparative evaluation of video-based online course versus serious game for training medical students in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised trial. PLoS ONE, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214722
Shreaves, D. L. (2020). Faculty perceptions of online teaching at a midsized liberal arts university. Online Learning Journal, 24(3), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2199
Spencer, D. (2021). Examining students’ online course perceptions and comparing student performance outcomes in online and face-to-face classrooms. Online Learning Journal, 25(2), 233–261. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i2.2227
Swartzwelder, K. (2019). The impact of text-based and video discussions on student engagement and interactivity in an online course. Journal of Educators Online, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2019.16.1.13
Szopi?ski, T. (2022). Student evaluation of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174(Query date: 2024-02-26 16:25:49). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121203
Yu, E. (2020). Student-inspired optimal design of online learning for generation Z. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1). https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85079442552
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Lilis Nurteti, Victor Benny Alexsius Pardosi, Mumu Muzayyin Maq, Saidatul Hanim, Jonris Tampubolon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
