Evaluation of the Fiqh Learning Process
Downloads
Background. The learning process is one of the things that needs to be considered in education. If the process is good, it is likely that the results that will be obtained will also be good. To achieve optimal learning outcomes, a maximum learning process is needed. In a learning process, every educator and learner should be familiar with the process. Because knowing about a learning process, will make educators and students understand the purpose and objectives of learning. So that the learning process is not lame.
Purpose. the purpose of this study was to determine the results of the evaluation of fiqh learning in MA Asy-Syafi'iyah Bangsalsari Jember.
Method. In this study, researchers used qualitative methods. Qualitative research methods are research methods used to research on natural object conditions, where the researcher is the key instrument, data collection techniques are triangulated, data analysis is inductive, and qualitative research results emphasise meaning rather than generalisation .
Results. The result of this research is the learning of Fiqh material at MA Asy-Syafi'iyah Bangsalsari Jember is good. The educators are linear with the subject, very supportive of the learning process. So that the learning process in MA Asy-Syafi'iyah runs well and maximum.
Conclusion. Evaluation is something that is very urgent in the world of education. It needs to be done regularly. The existence of this mini research, of course, is to find out how the learning process has taken place during one semester. By paying attention to the process, the results of interviews from teachers, and student report cards, researchers have been able to conclude that, learning Fiqh material at MA Asy-Syafi'iyah Bangsalsari Jember is good.
Ashour, S. (2020). Quality higher education is the foundation of a knowledge society: Where does the UAE stand? Quality in Higher Education, 26(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1769263
Bustamante, A. S., Dearing, E., Zachrisson, H. D., & Vandell, D. L. (2022). Adult outcomes of sustained high?quality early child care and education: Do they vary by family income? Child Development, 93(2), 502–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13696
Capó-Bauçà, S., Marqués, A., Llopis-Vidal, N., Bota, J., & Baraza, E. (2019). Long-term establishment of natural green cover provides agroecosystem services by improving soil quality in a Mediterranean vineyard. Ecological Engineering, 127, 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.12.008
Chakraborty, K., Bhatia, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Platos, J., Bag, R., & Hassanien, A. E. (2020). Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 tweets by Deep Learning Classifiers—A study to show how popularity is affecting accuracy in social media. Applied Soft Computing, 97, 106754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106754
Dewantara, I. P. M. (2020). Curriculum changes in Indonesia: Teacher constraints and students of prospective teachers’ readiness in the implementation of thematic learning at low grade primary school. ?lkö?retim Online, 1047–1060. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.696686
Frizzo-Barker, J., Chow-White, P. A., Adams, P. R., Mentanko, J., Ha, D., & Green, S. (2020). Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: A systematic review. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 102029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.10.014
Imran, Ghaffar, Z., Alshahrani, A., Fayaz, M., Alghamdi, A. M., & Gwak, J. (2021). A Topical Review on Machine Learning, Software Defined Networking, Internet of Things Applications: Research Limitations and Challenges. Electronics, 10(8), 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10080880
Jang, K., Kim, N., & An, Y.-K. (2019). Deep learning–based autonomous concrete crack evaluation through hybrid image scanning. Structural Health Monitoring, 18(5–6), 1722–1737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921718821719
Lacka, E., Wong, T. C., & Haddoud, M. Y. (2021). Can digital technologies improve students’ efficiency? Exploring the role of Virtual Learning Environment and Social Media use in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 163, 104099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104099
Marshall, M. (2020). Knowledge and Forms in Plato’s Educational Philosophy. Educational Theory, 70(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12417
Negreira-Rey, M.-C., Vázquez-Herrero, J., & López-García, X. (2022). Blurring Boundaries Between Journalists and Tiktokers: Journalistic Role Performance on TikTok. Media and Communication, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4699
O’Shay-Wallace, S. (2020). “We Weren’t Raised that Way”: Using Stigma Management Communication Theory to Understand How Families Manage the Stigma of Substance Abuse. Health Communication, 35(4), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1567443
Rufí-Salís, M., Calvo, M. J., Petit-Boix, A., Villalba, G., & Gabarrell, X. (2020). Exploring nutrient recovery from hydroponics in urban agriculture: An environmental assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104683
Rychert, M., & Wilkins, C. (2019). A ‘community enterprise’ model for recreational cannabis: Lessons from alcohol licensing trusts in New Zealand. International Journal of Drug Policy, 67, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.03.007
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sovacool, B. K., Kester, J., Noel, L., & Zarazua De Rubens, G. (2020). Actors, business models, and innovation activity systems for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 131, 109963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109963
Stratford, R. (2019). Educational philosophy, ecology and the Anthropocene. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(2), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1403803
Sumarwati, S., Fitriyani, H., Azhar Setiaji, F. M., Hasril Amiruddin, M., & Afiat Jalil, S. (2020). Developing Mathematics Learning Media Based on E-Learning using Moodle on Geometry Subject to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 14(04), 182. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i04.12731
Suseno, Y., & Abbott, L. (2021). Women entrepreneurs’ digital social innovation: Linking gender, entrepreneurship, social innovation and information systems. Information Systems Journal, 31(5), 717–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12327
Tsai, M.-N., Liao, Y.-F., Chang, Y.-L., & Chen, H.-C. (2020). A brainstorming flipped classroom approach for improving students’ learning performance, motivation, teacher-student interaction and creativity in a civics education class. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100747
Urbina, M. A., Correa, F., Aburto, F., & Ferrio, J. P. (2020). Adsorption of polyethylene microbeads and physiological effects on hydroponic maize. Science of The Total Environment, 741, 140216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140216
Xian, Y., Lampert, C. H., Schiele, B., & Akata, Z. (2019). Zero-Shot Learning—A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 41(9), 2251–2265. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2857768
Zhu, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, C., Zhang, Z., Zhou, X., Liu, W., & Zhu, B. (2020). A new and reliable dual model- and data-driven TOC prediction concept: A TOC logging evaluation method using multiple overlapping methods integrated with semi-supervised deep learning. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 188, 106944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.106944
Copyright (c) 2023 Lutfi Alfarizi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
