Measuring the Improvement of Students’ Critical Thinking Abilities through Seamless Learning: A Quasi-Experimental Approach
Downloads
Background. 21st century education emphasizes the importance of developing high-level thinking skills (HOTS) for students, including analysis, evaluation and synthesis skills. Seamless learning, which integrates technology and media, becomes relevant in this context because it creates a dynamic and connected learning experience.
Purpose. This research aims to measure the increase in students’ critical thinking abilities through seamless learning using quasi-experimental methods. By adopting this approach, the research seeks to provide empirical evidence about the effectiveness of seamless learning in improving students’ critical thinking abilities.
Method. This research methodology takes a quantitative approach with quasi-experimental methods. Data was collected from a school in West Sumatra, with research subjects being grade 7 students. Data collection was carried out through critical thinking ability test instruments before and after the learning period. Analysis was carried out using the t-test in SPSS to compare the two groups.
Results. The results of the analysis showed significant differences between the experimental and control groups, with a greater increase in critical thinking ability scores in the experimental group. The resulting t value was 0.05, with a p value of less than 0.05, indicating that the difference between the two groups did not occur by chance. This confirms that seamless learning has a positive impact in improving students’ critical thinking abilities.
Conclusion. These findings highlight the success of seamless learning in improving students’ critical thinking abilities. However, this study has limitations, such as the relatively small sample size and limited duration of the intervention. Further research with larger sample sizes is recommended to deepen this understanding.
Alalwan, N., Cheng, L., Al-Samarraie, H., Yousef, R., Ibrahim Alzahrani, A., & Sarsam, S. M. (2020). Challenges and Prospects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Utilization among Primary School Teachers: A Developing Country Perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100876
Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: A review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1017–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09718-8
Asari, S., Husniah, R., Ma’rifah, U., & Anwar, K. (2019). Fostering Students’ High Order Thinking Skills through the Use of Interpretation Cards. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(4), 17. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.4p.17
Bojovi?, Ž., Bojovi?, P. D., Vujoševi?, D., & Šuh, J. (2020). Education in times of crisis: Rapid transition to distance learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1467–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22318
Dumitru, D., Minciu, M., Mihaila, R. A., Livinti, R., & Paduraru, M. E. (2023). Experimental Programs of Critical Thinking Enhancement: A Worked-Based, Blended Learning Higher Education Curriculum for Economics. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101031
Hamid, A., Setyosari?, P., Ulfa, S., & Kuswandi?, D. (2019). The Implementation of Mobile Seamless Learning Strategy in Mastering Students’ Concepts for Elementary School. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 967–982. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.622416
Haryanto, P. C., & Arty, I. S. (2019). The Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning in Natural Science to Improve Student’s HOTS and Self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 012106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012106
Himmetoglu, B., Aydug, D., & Bayrak, C. (2020). EDUCATION 4.0: DEFINING THE TEACHER, THE STUDENT, AND THE SCHOOL MANAGER ASPECTS OF THE REVOLUTION. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770896
Hsiao, I.-C. V., Hung, S.-T. A., & Huang, H.-T. D. (2023). The flipped classroom approach in an English for specific purposes (ESP) course: A quasi-experimental study on learners’ self-efficacy, study process, and learning performances. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1976329
Hussein, M. H., Ow, S. H., Cheong, L. S., & Thong, M.-K. (2019). A Digital Game-Based Learning Method to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Elementary Science. IEEE Access, 7, 96309–96318. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929089
Li, L. (2020). Education supply chain in the era of Industry 4.0. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(4), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2702
Meng, Q., Jia, J., & Zhang, Z. (2020). A framework of smart pedagogy based on the facilitating of high order thinking skills. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-11-2019-0076
Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing Design Education for the 21st Century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002
Polizzi, G. (2020). Digital literacy and the national curriculum for England: Learning from how the experts engage with and evaluate online content. Computers & Education, 152, 103859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103859
Rane, N. (2023). Enhancing Mathematical Capabilities through ChatGPT and Similar Generative Artificial Intelligence: Roles and Challenges in Solving Mathematical Problems. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4603237
Ruggieri, C. (2020). Students’ use and perception of textbooks and online resources in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020123
?ahi?N, M., & Aybek, E. (2020). Jamovi: An Easy to Use Statistical Software for the Social Scientists. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 670–692. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.661803
Shalaby, W., Zadrozny, W., & Jin, H. (2019). Beyond word embeddings: Learning entity and concept representations from large scale knowledge bases. Information Retrieval Journal, 22(6), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-018-9340-3
Shemshack, A., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2021). A comprehensive analysis of personalized learning components. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(4), 485–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00188-7
Silalahi, D. E., Herman, H., Sihombing, P. S. R., Damanik, A. S., & Purba, L. (2022). An Analysis of Students’ Achievement in Reading Comprehension through Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 1853–1868. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.1249
Swaran Singh, C. K., Gopal, R., Ong, E. T., Masa Singh, T. S., Mostafa, N. A., & Ambar Singh, R. K. (2020). ESL TEACHERSâ€TM STRATEGIES TO FOSTER HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS TO TEACH WRITING. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.2.7
Veluvali, P., & Surisetti, J. (2022). Learning Management System for Greater Learner Engagement in Higher Education—A Review. Higher Education for the Future, 9(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/23476311211049855
Voon, X. P., Wong, L. H., Looi, C. K., & Chen, W. (2020). Constructivism?informed variation theory lesson designs in enriching and elevating science learning: Case studies of seamless learning design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1531–1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21624
Wali?D, A., Saji?Dan, S., Ramli?, M., & Kusumah, R. G. T. (2019). Construction of The Assessment Concept to Measure Students’ High Order Thinking Skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.528180
Wark, N., & Ally, M. (2020). An Emergent Pedagogical Framework for Integrating Emergent Technologies into Curriculum Design. In S. Yu, M. Ally, & A. Tsinakos (Eds.), Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum (pp. 89–111). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0618-5_6
Copyright (c) 2024 Putu Satya Narayanti, Andiopenta Purba, Aat Ruchiat Nugraha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.