The Role of Constructivism in Modern Educational Philosophy: A Comparative Analysis
Article Sidebar
-
Active Learning, Constructivism, Comparative Analysis, Educational Philosophy, Teaching Strategies
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Constructivism has been a foundational theory in modern educational philosophy, emphasizing the role of the learner in constructing knowledge through experience and interaction with their environment. This pedagogical approach contrasts with traditional methods that prioritize rote learning and teacher-centered instruction. As educational systems evolve to meet the demands of the 21st century, understanding the role of constructivism in shaping contemporary educational practices becomes crucial.
Objective: This study aims to compare the role of constructivism in modern educational philosophy by analyzing its impact across different educational settings. Specifically, the research examines how constructivist principles are integrated into various teaching strategies and how they influence student learning outcomes in comparison to traditional approaches.
Method: A qualitative comparative analysis was conducted, involving a review of existing literature and case studies from different educational institutions. Data was gathered from research articles, educational reports, and interviews with educators who implement constructivist methodologies. The study also compared case examples from countries with varying educational systems to explore the global application of constructivism.
Results: The study found that constructivist teaching strategies significantly improve critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaborative learning skills among students. Schools that implemented constructivist approaches reported higher student engagement and greater long-term retention of knowledge. In contrast, traditional methods were more effective for rote memorization but less conducive to developing higher-order thinking skills.
Conclusion: Constructivism plays a pivotal role in modern educational philosophy, promoting active learning and student-centered education. The findings suggest that constructivist approaches are more aligned with the demands of the contemporary workforce and help prepare students for complex real-world challenges.
Full text article
References
Alanoglu, M. (2022). Do teachers’ educational philosophies affect their digital literacy? The mediating effect of resistance to change. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3447–3466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10753-3
Alismaiel, O. A. (2022). Online Learning, Mobile Learning, and Social Media Technologies: An Empirical Study on Constructivism Theory during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811134
Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students’ critical thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929
An, T. (2021). What in the world is educational technology? Rethinking the field from the perspective of the philosophy of technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1810066
Barbehön, M. (2020). Reclaiming constructivism: Towards an interpretive reading of the ‘Social Construction Framework.’ Policy Sciences, 53(1), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09370-7
Bauer, G. R. (2021). Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM - Population Health, 14(Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798
Bogna, F. (2020). Critical realism and constructivism: Merging research paradigms for a deeper qualitative study. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 15(4), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-06-2019-1778
Boyd, R. (2023). Constructivism, realism, and philosophical method. Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science, Query date: 2024-12-01 18:50:51, 131–198.
Cadogan, J. W. (2023). A miracle of measurement or accidental constructivism? How PLS subverts the realist search for truth. European Journal of Marketing, 57(6), 1703–1724. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2020-0637
Candra. (2020). A meta-analysis of constructivism learning implementation towards the learning outcomes on civic education lesson. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 835–846. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13256a
Epp, S. (2021). Radical transformation: Embracing constructivism and pedagogy for an innovative nursing curriculum. Journal of Professional Nursing, 37(5), 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.06.007
Geels, F. W. (2020). Micro-foundations of the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions: Developing a multi-dimensional model of agency through crossovers between social constructivism, evolutionary economics and neo-institutional theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152(Query date: 2024-12-01 18:50:51). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119894
Jarrah, A. M. (2020). Implementing pragmatism and John Dewey’s educational philosophy in Emirati elementary schools: Case of mathematics and science teachers. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 11(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2020.104287
Jin, J. (2020). A study on the constructivism learning method for BIM/IPD collaboration education. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155169
Li, D. (2020). Nanosol SERS quantitative analytical method: A review. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 127(Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2020.115885
Li, Z. (2020). From community-acquired pneumonia to COVID-19: A deep learning–based method for quantitative analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT scans. European Radiology, 30(12), 6828–6837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07042-x
Matta, C. (2021). Neuroscience and educational practice–A critical assessment from the perspective of philosophy of science. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1773801
McKnight, A. (2020). “No Shame at AIME”: Listening to Aboriginal Philosophy and Methodologies to Theorise Shame in Educational Contexts. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 49(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/jie.2018.14
Mohammed. (2020). The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.41
Mueller, A. V. (2020). Quantitative Method for Comparative Assessment of Particle Removal Efficiency of Fabric Masks as Alternatives to Standard Surgical Masks for PPE. Matter, 3(3), 950–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.07.006
Murphy, P. K. (2023). Hast thee any philosophy?: Unearthing the value of philosophy for educational psychology. Handbook of Educational Psychology, Query date: 2024-12-01 18:51:57, 15–47. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433726-4
O’Connor, K. (2022). Constructivism, curriculum and the knowledge question: Tensions and challenges for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750585
Orak, S. D. (2021). In between 21st century skills and constructivism in elt: Designing a model derived from a narrative literature review. World Journal of English Language, 11(2), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v11n2p166
Ospina-Carmona, J. F. (2022). Philosophy of mind and some learning paradigms in educational psychology. Sophia(Ecuador), 2022(33), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n33.2022.01
Pande, M. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36(Query date: 2024-12-01 18:50:51). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637
Peters, M. A. (2020). Wittgenstein, Anti-foundationalism, Technoscience and Philosophy of Education: An Educational Philosophy and Theory Reader: Volume VIII. In Wittgenstein, Anti-foundationalism, Technoscience and Philosophy of Education: An Educational Philosophy and Theory Reader: Volume VIII (Vol. 8, p. 178). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003017035
Peters, M. A. (2021). The Methodology and Philosophy of Collective Writing: An Educational Philosophy and Theory Reader Volume X. In The Methodology and Philosophy of Collective Writing: An Educational Philosophy and Theory Reader Volume X (p. 352). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003171959
Peters, M. A. (2022a). Educational philosophies of self-cultivation: Chinese humanism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(11), 1720–1726. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1811679
Peters, M. A. (2022b). Post-marxism, humanism and (post)structuralism: Educational philosophy and theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(14), 2331–2340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1824783
Peters, M. A. (2023). The open peer review experiment in Educational Philosophy and Theory (EPAT). Educational Philosophy and Theory, 55(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1846519
Rodriguez, J. M. G. (2021). Analysis of biochemistry students’ graphical reasoning using misconceptions constructivism and fine-grained constructivism: Why assumptions about the nature and structure of knowledge matter for research and teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(4), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp00041a
Roth, W. D. (2023). Conceptualizations of Race: Essentialism and Constructivism. Annual Review of Sociology, 49(Query date: 2024-12-01 18:50:51), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-034017
?ahan, H. H. (2020). The Relationship of Prospective Teachers’ Educational Philosophy and Life-long Learning Tendencies to their Teaching-learning Process Competencies. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 10(4), 1325–1367. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.040
Sayaf, A. M. (2023). Adoption of E-learning systems: An integration of ISSM and constructivism theories in higher education. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13014
Stek, K. (2022). PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE ERA OF INDUSTRY 4.0: COMPARING EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES AND PHILOSOPHIES IN INDUSTRY 1.0 AND INDUSTRY 4.0. Advanced Series in Management, 28(Query date: 2024-12-01 18:51:57), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1877-636120220000028005
Veldhuizen, C. (2021). Conceptualising the foundations of sustainability focused innovation policy: From constructivism to holism. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162(Query date: 2024-12-01 18:50:51). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120374
Voon, X. P. (2020). Constructivism-informed variation theory lesson designs in enriching and elevating science learning: Case studies of seamless learning design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1531–1553. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21624
Winch, C. (2022). Educational explanations: Philosophy in empirical educational research. In Educational Explanations: Philosophy in Empirical Educational Research (p. 336). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119816461
Yin, Q. (2020). Blending Constructivism and Instructivism: A Study of Classroom Dialogue in Singapore Kindergartens. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(4), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1709926
Yue, F. (2022). Effects of monosaccharide composition on quantitative analysis of total sugar content by phenol-sulfuric acid method. Frontiers in Nutrition, 9(Query date: 2024-12-01 09:57:11). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.963318
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Amie Primarni, Ardit Hoxha, Rashad Rzayev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
