Evaluation of the Effect of Teacher Training on the Use of Learning Technology
Abstract
Background. Teachers are a profession responsible for educating, guiding, teaching, and training students. The teacher's role is important in nurturing to develop students' knowledge, attitudes, and skills. The role of teachers who provide knowledge as access to information is now aided by digital sophistication. In this case, teachers must be able to control technology for learning to students. The learning process must of course be evaluated so that the weaknesses and strengths in learning can be identified.
Purpose This study aims to evaluate the effect of teacher training in the use of learning technology. This evaluation will provide an overview of the effectiveness of the training in improving teachers' understanding of learning technology. In addition, it assesses the impact that the use of technology has on student learning outcomes.
Method. The method used in this research is quantitative method. Data collection is done by distributing questionnaires to teachers. Making statements related to evaluating the effect of teacher training in the use of learning technology. This statement is loaded in google from which will be processed through the SPSS application. The data obtained can be tested by proving the statements listed on Google from adjusted through facts that often occur in the world of education.
Results. The results of this study suggest that evaluating the impact of teacher training can provide a basis for developing a sustainable training curriculum. The role of technology in education will change the way students learn and also the learning outcomes. This evaluation will give teachers an idea of how much students develop after the use of technology.
Conclusion The conclusion of this study is that evaluation of teachers in the use of technology is also needed. Evaluation of the effect of teacher training on the use of learning technology is an assessment process to measure the extent to which training has an impact on teachers' ability to use technology. The difference in teachers' perspectives on technology also affects how much technology is used in learning. Teachers will also be a forum for the advancement of education. So that it can expand the application of technology in education.
Full text article
References
Abma, T. (2019). The Ethics of Public and Service User Involvement in Health Research: The Need for Participatory Reflection on Everyday Ethical Issues. American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1619869
Alber, M. (2019). Integrating machine learning and multiscale modeling—Perspectives, challenges, and opportunities in the biological, biomedical, and behavioral sciences. npj Digital Medicine, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0193-y
Aledhari, M. (2020). Federated Learning: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications. IEEE Access, 8(Query date: 2024-02-10 00:39:22), 140699–140725. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3013541
Al-Fraihat, D. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102(Query date: 2024-02-10 00:39:22), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Arvapally, M. (2021). Development of an analytical method for the quantitative determination of multi-class nutrients in different food matrices by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using design of experiments. Food Chemistry, 341(Query date: 2024-02-10 03:38:39). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128173
Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
Ballantyne, A. (2019). Research ethics revised: The new CIOMS guidelines and the world medical association declaration of helsinki in context. Bioethics, 33(3), 310–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12581
Bauer, G. R. (2019). Advancing quantitative intersectionality research methods: Intracategorical and intercategorical approaches to shared and differential constructs. Social Science and Medicine, 226(Query date: 2024-02-10 03:38:39), 260–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.018
Bi, W. L. (2019). Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 69(2), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21552
Blake, H. (2020). Mitigating the psychological impact of covid-19 on healthcare workers: A digital learning package. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17092997
Bullich, S. (2020). Evaluation of dosimetry, quantitative methods, and test-Retest variability of 18F-PI-2620 PET for the assessment of tau deposits in the human brain. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61(6), 920–927. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.236240
Cicale, E. M. (2023). A rubric as a tool for summative and formative evaluation in Laboratory Animals Technologist degree at the University of Buenos Aires (Argentina). Laboratory Animals, 57(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772221124383
Collins, G. S. (2019). Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models. The Lancet, 393(10181), 1577–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30037-6
Deng, S. (2020). Edge Intelligence: The Confluence of Edge Computing and Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(8), 7457–7469. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2984887
Dis, E. A. M. van. (2023). ChatGPT: five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
Duan, Y. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data – evolution, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48(Query date: 2024-02-10 00:39:22), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life. International Journal of Information Management, 55(Query date: 2024-02-10 00:39:22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102211
Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57(Query date: 2024-02-10 00:39:22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71(Query date: 2024-02-10 00:39:22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Esteva, A. (2021). Deep learning-enabled medical computer vision. npj Digital Medicine, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00376-2
Fang, H. (2019). An Overview of Global Leaf Area Index (LAI): Methods, Products, Validation, and Applications. Reviews of Geophysics, 57(3), 739–799. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000608
Hassija, V. (2019). A Survey on IoT Security: Application Areas, Security Threats, and Solution Architectures. IEEE Access, 7(Query date: 2024-02-10 00:39:22), 82721–82743. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924045
Iglesias-Pradas, S. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119(Query date: 2024-02-10 00:39:22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713
Jiang, W. (2021). The road towards 6G: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, 2(Query date: 2024-02-10 00:39:22), 334–366. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2021.3057679
Kato, K. (2022). Radiography education with VR using head mounted display: Proficiency evaluation by rubric method. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03645-8
Rosa, Y. A. D. L. (2021). Development of professional competencies in people with disabilities for the practice of Sports Training: A view from the Andrés case. Retos, 39, 576–584. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i39.78859
Thomas, S. W. (2019). Contemporary stem issues: Engineering training of pre-service teachers for middle school stem curriculum development (evaluation). ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Query date: 2024-02-10 00:33:03. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85078807001
Zheng, Y. (2023). Evaluation of Online Teaching Effect of Vocational College Teachers Based on TOPSIS Technology and the Hierarchical Chi-Square Model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(15), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i15.42251
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Meisuri Meisuri, Yuliza Andriyani Siregar, Abdul Halik, Indra Bakti, Mohamad Firdaus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.